The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:41, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lama Gonpo Tseten[edit]

Lama Gonpo Tseten (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in meeting WP:GNG. No reliable sources, references personal affiliates, and the most of the article can be attributed to a self-published blog by the editor who created and wrote most of the article. Student reports in the article are completely unreliable/unsourced and have dubious claims. Could not find reliable independent sources when searching. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Religion, Buddhism, and China. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, with WP:TNT. I admit I looked only very briefly for sources, finding nothing but places that copied from Wikipedia, but I strongly doubt that most of the article in its current state can be verified by wikipedia's WP:RS standards. -- asilvering (talk) 01:34, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.