The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 21:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lasalle-Lakeshore United

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been here a long time and much work has gone into it. However, this is an amateur team in a very low ranked competition and there are no non-trivial, verifiable and objective sources. Individual junior coaches of the team are now getting articles. Porturology (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:35, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. Giant Snowman 09:36, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable team. Argyle 4 Life^talk 10:18, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The team participates in a National Cup. The team competes in a Provincial League (basically 4th level in Canada) whose members are eligible for the Canadian National Challenge Cup. WP:FOOTYN --Coppercanuck (talk) 14:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:FOOTYN says "played in a national cup" - which raises 2 points: 1. Does this competition qualify as it is an amateur cup from which (as I understand it) Canadian elite teams are excluded. 2. Has this team ever competed in the cup which, I understand, is between the 1 team from each province. Porturology (talk) 03:30, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have just noticed that the article specifically states that they have never qualified Porturology (talk) 04:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As they have never qualified for the Challenge Cup, they clearly fail WP:FOOTYN, and there is no indication the club passes WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:16, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.