The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Fabris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF or WP:GNG, perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Has a publication with over 1000 cites on Google Scholar (over 1/4 of total), but was one of many authors. Awards aren't sufficient to show notability either. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Women. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Substantial and increasing citations warrant pass of WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Her papers have many coauthors, but even the first-author papers have citation counts 159, 142, 96, etc. I think that's enough for WP:PROF#C1. Our article is out of date; she appears to have a full professorship at the Polytechnic University of Turin [1] [2]. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.