The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Creator requested deletion (G7). — Earwig ^talk 07:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LeMel Humes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not historically relevant Cerisecastle (talk) 02:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 November 19. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question: @Cerisecastle: You created the article, and now you say subject is "not historically relevant", why? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the nominator/creator is the only significant contributor to the article, it may qualify for deletion under WP:G7. clpo13_(talk) 20:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 20:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 20:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.