The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 23:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Legacy of peace (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I can't find a lot about this DVD release, apart from enthusiastic blurbs on its own website. Doesn't seem to meet WP:MOVIE at all. Current article also happens to be a copyvio, but that's another story.    SIS  23:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete under CSD G12 as a blatant copyvio or under CSD G11 as blatant advertising. Your choice. --Dynaflow babble 23:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No, my choice was to bring it here to see if it belongs on WP in the first place. The copyvio or advertising problem can be easily solved, but if rewriting (or recreating) the article is a waste of time because the film doesn't meet WP:MOVIE to start with, why bother?    SIS  23:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found what might be a review here (pay to read), but that seems to be it. I'm going to have say any justification for keeping it under WP:MOVIE will probably be tenuous at best. --Dynaflow babble 23:47, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment about copyvio - Since ownership of the website in question has been asserted, that removes the "blatant" from "blatant copyright violation", and predicates CSD G12. The article will be deleted after 7 days regardless of this AfD unless someone proves that permission to release the text under the GFDL is presented. – Toon^(talk) 00:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, I'm not seeing the kind of coverage sufficient to indicate notability, and I do have access to the full text of the article linked above and several other databases. That really is it. Barring some Arabic-language source, I don't think there's a good rationale to keep. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 00:00, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:44, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.