The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:32, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lenny Pridatko

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page seems to primarily be a promotional page for Lenny Pridatko and his businesses (book, publishing company that has only published his works, etc.). I do not see anything here that shows he is notable and that this article should be on Wikipedia. Stesmo (talk) 22:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up the page to comply with wikipedia's policies against self-promotion. Shmendr (talk) 05:58, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reinstated some of this deleted text: the Awards section is not promotional as such, and is relevant to consideration of whether the subject meets the Notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 06:25, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Multiple searches (Highbeam, Questia, Google) are not returning reliable 3rd party material on the subject and his work; nor do the awards listed in the article provide enough to meet the WP:CREATIVE criteria at this stage in his career. AllyD (talk) 06:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 20:46, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (articulate) @ 20:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - 1) the article has been edited solely by a WP:SPA. Admittedly, it is new, but this doesn't confer confidence. 2) the awards themselves are not notable. There are about 100 finalists for the Eric Hoffer award each year. The indieFab organization appears to be a two-person team that exists to promote indie publishing. The award there is a Finalist, not a winner. The Beverly Hills award: "Beverly Hills Book Awards is a trademark of Smarketing". So as far as I can see, all of the third party resources are marketing and promotion organizations. LaMona (talk) 20:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.