The result was Keep. The arguments of Shirahadasha have carried the consensus in this discussion. Xoloz (talk) 13:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is the third time this page has been created by the same user. The first time it was deleted per an AfD because the subject was considered not notable and of local interest only. The second time the article was speedy deleted for being almost the same as the initial article. The main difference between this version and the last deleted version (and the reason I didn't request a speedy delete) is that the subject has now been profiled in a single newspaper article as being one of the last two members of a local Jewish congregation. I believe this still makes him of local interest only and that the subject does not meet the notability requirements. I've asked the author for more information [1] on why this person is more notable than any other church caretaker but have gotten no response. Karanacs (talk) 15:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
*Going to have to say that I don't see the notability in the roles of this individual. Certainly, I appreciate the sources and respect the hard work done here, but the sources have merely verified that the individual has a non-notable role (outside of the local community). Merge to B'Nai Abraham Synagogue, Brenham for me. Pastordavid (talk) 17:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)