The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. Having been previously prodded makes this ineligible for WP:SOFTDELETE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:17, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Les Voyageurs Inc.

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little better than an advertisement, this unsourced article has survived for nearly five years. It was previously prodded and deprodded, so, as a procedural matter, a prod is out of order. Hence I'm bringing it here. B (talk) 03:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:24, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No relevant third-party sources are in the article to establish notability, and I was unable to find any online. It is not notable, and is simply an advertisement. - SudoGhost (talk) 08:41, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.