The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:59, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Li Shuguang[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this person — presumably a tenured professor, but not indicated as such by the article — sufficiently notable? Nothing in the article suggests so. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 15:31, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see anything notable in article or google links... If you look at the original version of the article, it is written very carelessly and full of mistakes... Tradedia (talk) 16:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm not finding anything that would allow this person to meet the criteria for WP:ACADEMIC. Rorshacma (talk) 18:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.