The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:10, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liberty Justice Center[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Notability isn't inherited. There are no in-depth references on this organization that meets WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While some funded lawsuits have notability, that does not give the Liberty Justice Center notability. Mentions of the center are in passing when covering the legal cases. As the nominator said, there seems to be no in depth coverage of the center itself. Lacking notability under the guidelines is a reasonable basis for deletion. There is no information need that such an article might fill, beacuse there is no significant information available in reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 21:34, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This was the organization that argued Janus v. AFSCME in front of the Supreme Court, which was a landmark case this summer. That makes it pretty notable. --Michael Powerhouse (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Almost all the cited work is extremely minor; for the one significant case, they were only one of the great many organizations involved. I do not see evidence that it was one of their attorneys that participated in the oral argument--and , if so, it would contribute to the notability of that attorney, not of them. DGG ( talk ) 21:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking WP:SIGCOV or Merge to Illinois Policy Institute (which also currently has an AFD active, so the merge option would only be applicable if that article is kept). Marquardtika (talk) 18:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.