The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:54, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lightglove

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN product, fails the GNG. Despite the article's assertions, there are ZERO news or newspaper hits in reliable sources (never mind the "significant coverage" the GNG requires). Notability tagged for over a decade. Article created by a SPA who was, in fact, the creator of this product (see talk page); obvious COI is obvious. In previous AfD, the article was speedied for copyvio. Ravenswing 02:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ravenswing 02:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't think it ever demonstrated notability and it's clear from a glance at the product's aged website that it doesn't exist any more. asnac (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of coverage suggests it doesn't pass WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 20:37, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.