The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to House Un-American Activities Committee. Not a strong consensus, but it seems closer to what the participants want than a "no consensus" default keep. RL0919 (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lilly Popper

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Article with two references, neither of which come close to establishing notability. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The only coverage for her that I can find is primary sources (government) when she invoked the Fifth Amendment during the House Un-American Activities Committee hearings. It's possible that there might be contemporary newspaper coverage of the hearings that talk about her, but I don't know that this one event is sufficient for WP:GNG. UrbanToreador (talk) 20:09, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found some news coverage of her which I added to the article. However, I really can't decide what to do about her. I think maybe redirecting to House Un-American Activities Committee until someone writes a better bio about her. There's a lot of primary sources about her (many which I didn't add since they wouldn't show notability) so I could see that as a future possibility. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is basically one event notability, and that is just not cutting it. Not every piano teacher is notable, and being called before a congressional committee also does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 01:30, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: I would not be against a "Redirect" per User:Megalibrarygirl as a compromise. No bio here and the one inconclusive hearing would not be enough. There may be more secondary sources "out there" but agree with delete if redirect does not find favor. Otr500 (talk) 15:11, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.