The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus for delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:22, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lincoln Isham

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a great-grandson of Abraham Lincoln isn't enough for an article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not pass WP:GNG, very few sources. Agree that being a great- grandson of Abraham Lincoln is not enough to gain him an article.

KoreanWon talk 04:53, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per above. Nothing notable in the article. MB (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: notability not conferrable solely by being related to a notable individual. This is very clear, Wikipedia 101. Quis separabit? 14:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's still nothing for actual notability as its own article. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, falls down on the GNG (being distantly related to someone famous isn't in itself notable, and there's no claim to notability being *made* otherwise, let alone sourced). Fosse 8► 16:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.