The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lipad sa 2017: The Kapuso New Year Countdown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 02:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:22, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. A yearend countdown should not have its own article unless it is really notable. -WayKurat (talk) 04:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Most of the non-notability using own article every year. per WP:N because only the evidence are events like election special and death of Dolphy are passed article in the year. Oripaypaykim (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. Not notable enough to have it's own article. -Nickrds09 ^{(Talk to me)} 10:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.