The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. It seems that the crux of the argument here is whether or not the list is discriminate per the style guideline for lists, and a number of equally good arguments are raised on both sides. The comments in support of deleting the list argue that its members are linked only by virtue of their being the same species, while the comments in support of retaining it argue that the fictional nature and independent notability of the list members refutes this claim.
After discounting the arguments supporting the deletion of the list in favor of a category--as Colonel Warden points out, the two are not mutually exclusive--it seems that there is no firm resolution on whether or not the list is sufficiently discriminate. --jonny-mt 02:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Red Phoenix flame of life...protector of all... 04:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not indiscriminate, but redundant oif there is already a catergory.Yobmod (talk) 09:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]