The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
All of these characters are already listed in separate articles. TrackFan 19:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All these characters aren't notable enough to have separate articles. They need to be included in this list.—Preceding unsigned comment added by The Prince of Darkness (talk • contribs)
Delete as listcruft. All these characters can be easily found through the Kim Possible article or the accompanying box and category. There is no need to have this list as well. Tx17777 20:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per The Prince. The major characters have their own articles, so Minor characters in Kim Possible is the way to go. I suggest merging any other necessary content over to that page before deleting this one. --Idont Havaname (Talk) 21:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete get rid of this garbage as soon as possible. --=CJK= 21:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep And merge the indivdual articles into this one. The other ones should not be their own articles. isaid 01:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all the characters into this page....They're all written by citing the primary source, with no secondary sources to establish notability Corpx 04:18, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. If any of the characters listed here are minor then they should editorially be merged to Minor characters in Kim Possible, not here. Otto4711 08:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this "list" is useless as each entry is just a link to another article. JIP | Talk 10:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keeep and merge all the other ones mentioned into this one. It's the articles about the individual characters that might need the deletion. Much better to have them here. DGG (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Don't we already have a minor character article? WAVY 10 20:08, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.