The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of London Eye appearances in popular culture[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/List of London Eye appearances in popular culture (3rd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously AFD'd in 2008 and 2009 to no consensus and keep respectively - the article hasn't improved since then, and I think Wikipedia's notability standards for pop culture articles have increased as well. Largely uncited entries that consist of trivial appearances, and the sources that are there don't explain how the London Eye has impacted popular culture as a whole. Waxworker (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:LISTN as there are no reliable sources discussing the appearance of the London Eye in popular culture, nor are there sources discussing the listed entries as a group or set. Most of the individual entries are not sourced, those that are are usually only briefly mentioned in the source, and some of these are nothing more than "it appeared in the background of a scene set in London". Rorshacma (talk) 16:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I concur with Rorshacma, and also see [1].—--Pontificalibus 13:05, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.