The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Borderline WP:SNOW. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Angry Video Game Nerd episodes[edit]

List of The Angry Video Game Nerd episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete --- Fails Notabilty, WP:Notlist, Features Youtube as the main source. KoshVorlon' Naluboutes Aeria Gloris 20:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But, for what it's worth, it is the AVGN's official YouTube channel, even though he uploads his videos primarily on GameTrailers. –MuZemike 04:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
James Rolfe is under contract to screwattack, who in turn are under contract to gametrailers. Part of the terms of one or both of these contracts is that James cannot upload a video to his youtube account until it is old (around a year and a half, forgive me for not knowing the specifics). There are some of his newer videos that are available on youtube, and again I do not know specifically why this is so, but you will notice that the majority of the episodes from the past year and a half are not available on youtube, and can only be watched through screwattack. Again, my point is only that youtube is NOT the "main source" of the videos, though they do eventually become available there. Shakzor (talk) 12:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think you're right. If I recall, he re-posts his videos that are originally uploaded onto Screwattack.com to his YouTube channel about 6 months to a year after they're originally released. Though I would also think referencing directly from his Cinemassacre channel would also work as that would be the best way to verify, as you're closest to the source. Anyways, I think I'm veering off topic from this deletion discussion, so I'll leave it at that. –MuZemike 21:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.