The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 04:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Annoying Orange episodes[edit]

List of The Annoying Orange episodes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Massively WP:UNDUE, there is no Reason to have a list of episodes when the main article cannot sufficiently cover it. The Main Article barely scrapes WP:FILM and WP:WEB thus this does not need a stand alone list. Not to mention the "Seasons" delineation is 100% OR cant find anything on the Channel or the Few RS that exist that make the distinction. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 02:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the above reasons, plus the article is completely unsourced. Bob A (talk) 02:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:27, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, but edit. The division into seasons admittedly can't be specifically shown (because there was never a specific season finale). However, that's the only major problem with the page. If this isn't notable, then why does Fred Figglehorn have its own episode page? More importantly, how does any television series have its own episode page? Keep, remove the season delineations, and better patrol the page. --173.54.210.91 (talk) 10:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point. Personally I think that those pages should be deleted as well. See wp:other stuff exists. Bob A (talk) 17:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let me add this. It might seem non-notable, but if you notice what's happened over the years here, it seems that the Wiki has episode lists (and of course, in some cases pages on specific episodes such as Family Guy, The Simpsons, Seinfeld) for shows/webseries that have become so popular it becomes at least quasi-necessary for it to have at least a list. In the case of Annoying Orange, IMO it falls in the above category. As far as the episodes being tracked and counted, I've taken on the large responsibility of cataloging said episodes so there's not a lot of need to worry on that front (the only worry is from the people who continually add false information to the page). If there was an Annoying Orange related page that needed to be deleted, it would be this one. The unencyclopedic content issues that some are claiming to plague the episode page are definitely a problem here, as it keeps an unnecessary running tally of characters that made one appearance before being killed off. --173.54.210.91 (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's a fair point. I regard that as regrettable, but others will think differently. Bob A (talk) 02:01, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • We shall see. --173.54.210.91 (talk) 05:26, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • I meant in general, not in the context of this discussion. Bob A (talk) 06:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Yes I have seen them, no this is not notable enough for an encyclopedia. The only references that can be found are from youtube which is an unreliable source on wiki. Merge to The Annoying Orange After reading Ckatz's comment youtube looks to be okay here, the problem is secondary sources there and I do not feel that this is ready for it's own article yet. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep, but edit It's important to have a list of Annoying Orange episodes, especially those who never watched the series before, but it needs editing. 82.13.79.52 (talk) 14:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC) (I made sure I didn't forget to sign this message)[reply]
• Keep, possibly merge to main article. Sufficient notability, not sure why we're questioning YouTube as a reference source in this particular case as it is being used to confirm the content of a YouTube-based series. --Ckatz^chat_spy
• Maybe we should keep the article but attach some sources to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.133.26.118 (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.