The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn (WP:NAC). JJ98 (Talk) 02:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Totally unreferenced, this Powerpuff Girls characters lacks a lot of sources and citations. JJ98 (Talk) 19:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Whatever we decide should go for all CN articles like this. If you feel a change is in order, I see three choices here: merge with the main article (not possible without cutting out 90% of the content - it completely cluttered the Courage article), re-shape the article with refs and shorter descriptions (possible, but will take time), or we could always let someone else take care of it. Paper LuigiT • C 20:29, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, being unreferenced or lacking "a lot of sources and citations" is not an actual deletion rationale; the standard is verifiable, not verified. This is a typical split-off article from a notable television series article. Obviously the characters of a series need to be described in order to have comprehensive coverage of that series, so the only options are to keep as a stand-alone list or to merge to the series article, not to delete outright. It's clearly too long for The Powerpuff Girls to incorporate it, so stand-alone it is. postdlf (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Has great potential, just needs sources and bg info (such as character ideas, concept, ect..). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:34, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per points made above. We would have to make some serious changes to common practices (maybe make a new notability rule for lists of characters) if we were to delete this, though it could use a good trim by someone who knows the series to cut out the characters that are largely unneccesary, Sadads (talk) 01:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.