The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 08:37, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of bus routes in Cornwall[edit]

List of bus routes in Cornwall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia isn't a travel guide - this belongs on Wikivoyage, not here Davey2010 Talk 02:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a travel guide and doesn't fit into Wikivoyages scope. Mark999 (talk) 04:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's more suited to WV than here, WP is an encyclopaedia not a WP:NOTDIR Davey2010 Talk 04:30, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:27, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Often it doesn't change that much, 3-4 times a year of which most are very minor changes. And so are airport and airline articles listing destinations and are encyclopaedic information. Mark999 (talk) 09:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Other stuff exists is not a valid argument at AfD.--Charles (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


http://traveline.info/ is the correct source and a secondary source the bus operators. Mark999 (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC) It is NOT impossible to maintain services dont change that often! Mark999 (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I don't understand how the source you give can possibly be cited to provide details as it seems to require a search based, I presume, on an underlying database rather than providing information directly. I'm not convinced that's citable.
Secondly, I tried to bring one of these articles up to speed and update it fairly recently. It had been updated within the previous six months iirc. It was littered with omissions, routes that had been closed or changed this route, routes which had, seemingly, been renumbered and ones that had been added. The thought was that it was up to date - it wasn't. The experience, for a small article with only 20-30 routes iirc, convinced me that these articles can never be reliably up to date given standard wikipedia activity patterns. Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.