- List of chat websites (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced since 2013. Time to go for violating WP:V/WP:LISTN? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Lists. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Its a valid navigational list. Category:Chat websites exist. Lists are always more useful than categories as they allow more information to be listed. And WP:LISTN clearly states There is no present consensus for how to assess the notability of more complex and cross-categorization lists (such as "Lists of X of Y") or what other criteria may justify the notability of stand-alone lists and Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of any demonstrated notability. For years now these sorts of list have always been kept when sent to AFD. Dream Focus 14:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This is a poorly updated and random list. Some sites closed years ago. Plenty of other sites are not listed. Some are miscategorised (eg. Omegle as "adult"). The categories are random and not necessarily helpful. Finally, it violates WP:NLIST.
- WikiMane11 (talk) 00:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - At minimum, it's a fine navigational aid/index of articles on chat websites. The features in the tables need sources, yes, but that seems like a WP:NOTCLEANUP issue, since at worst those can just be removed should someone wish to challenge them. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 12:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]