The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to All Elite Wrestling#Championships. Sandstein 07:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of current champions in All Elite Wrestling[edit]

List of current champions in All Elite Wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely useless WP:SPLIT from main article. Main article is only 36k, far from need. No additional information added. Only reason given for creation is WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 00:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 00:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect back to to All Elite Wrestling#Championships as it was since late May 2019. Once time passes and more champions are crowned there will be a case for splitting the list but as it stands now it’s not necessary.--69.157.254.64 (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP First of all, why you don't sign with an wikipedia account? That's not very trustworthy! Second of all there is an article about List of current champions in Impact Wrestling. There are 4 championships, too! So your argument doesn't count! Every big wrestling promotion has an article about the current champions! Third of all, Galatz didn't follow the rules and deleted the article instead of nominating it for deletion! --TheGoldenRule (talk) 11:28, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, its about the article size of the article you are WP:SPLITing from. Compare the size of Impact Wrestling to All Elite Wrestling. - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 19:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Because if we're going to have any of these articles, then there's zero reason why a nationally televised promotion shouldn't have one. Why keep Impact or ROH, but not AEW?

Of course, the other option is to get rid of them all. None of these lists are so large as to need a separate article, not even WWE, and having lists both in the main promotion article and a separate list is a maintenance headache of redundant efforts. oknazevad (talk) 16:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats the WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument. There is plenty of details in the WWE one that is not in the main WWE page, which is massive already. - Galatz גאליץ^{שיחה Talk} 19:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm saying most of those "details" are simply prose repetition of the info in the chart. If you strip them out as unnecessary redundancy, then there's no reason to have a separate article for any promotion. I increasingly think they're unneeded redundancies. But if we're going to have them, then we should have them for all nationally televised promotions, for consistency. oknazevad (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I don't want an edit war. Then at least keep the pictures of the current champions in the main article. That would be fine for me. I hope we can come to an agreement.--TheGoldenRule (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to All Elite Wrestling#Championships as all relevant content can be covered there. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Is there an option to make the article better? No, then with the current information it can Redirect to All Elite Wrestling#Championships MPJ-DK (talk) 12:06, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.