The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as game guide content, transwikied to appropriate Metal Arms wiki.. Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:21, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of enemies in Metal Arms: Glitch in the System[edit]

List of enemies in Metal Arms: Glitch in the System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

I originally split this article from the Metal Arms page because it was unwieldly and incomprehensive. I now believe it should be deleted as per WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:IINFO. It should not be merged back into its original page because
1.The original article is already a jumbled mess of borderline-notable information, and
2.The page to be deleted is not notable and is not a focal point of the game. ZappyGun (talk) 14:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Fair enough. Should the original page receive any changes as a result of this deletion? Enemies are a significant part of the game. --Kizor 14:36, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Some characters appear to be important to the plot and can be added to the Character section, such as this "Vlax" person. There's adequate information on the "Mils" (the generic enemy "race") as well as the Zombie-bots.ZappyGun (talk) 14:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I've transwiki'd this page over to StrategyWiki:Metal Arms: Glitch in the System/Enemies (along with the main page for the game). -- Prod (Talk) 20:01, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as this fails the general notability guideline. Also fails the policy in Wikipedia:SUMMARY#Avoiding_unnecessary_splits about unnecessary splits that create new non-notable articles. A much better strategy is to expand the main article, without getting into unnecessary detail about enemies. Instead, focus on a summary of the overall style of enemies, and mention a few of the most notable ones. Randomran (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.