The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of multiple world heavyweight champions in professional wrestling[edit]

List of multiple world heavyweight champions in professional wrestling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. From GaryColemanfan's prod reasoning: This is totally subjective, as there is no agreed definition of what makes a "world championship." This article can never be accurate, let alone complete. ArcAngel (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Can't be fully sourced, and too many world titles to every become fully accurate. More like point of view according to the criteria mentioned in the article.--WillC 21:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for the reasons I gave in the PROD, particularly the fact that there is no criteria for inclusion or exclusion. GaryColemanFan (talk) 00:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 06:53, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete when no one can give a good definition for what is included in the list and what is not it becomes nothing but a subjective listcrufty article and is better off deleted.  MPJ-DK  (36,6% Done) Talk  06:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for the unclear definition of a World Title. Afro ^{Talkie Talk - Afkatk} 10:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as the subject is poorly defined then this list (though well put together) cannot be fully formed. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:LISTCRUFT. This is already adequately covered in the articles on the individual titles. RICK ME DOODLE YOU DOODLE 11:13, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.