The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of people on the postage stamps of Cambodia[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:LISTN. Very incomplete, abandoned, unsourced since creation in 2004, and mostly unread (some 30 pageviews in the last 90 days before the Proposed deletion). Fram (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people and Cambodia. Fram (talk) 08:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete seven people is hardly a list. With all of these stupid "list of people on the postage stamps of X" discussions, not a single person has proven why this meets WP:SALAT. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:58, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This is something for another kind of project, outside of Wikipedia. BD2412 T 21:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we have no sources that demonstrate that anyone when seeing this list of people would see them as a coherent group. Being on postage stamps can be done for trivial reasons, there is no reason to supposed appearing on postage stamps default makes a person notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Fram - The subject of this article is not important enough to warrant its own article. Hemanth Nalluri 11 (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NLIST. Avilich (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.