This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2008 November 27. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
Once I discounted the comments that either boiled down to accusations of bad-faith on the part of the nominator, or assertions along the lines of "It is interesting", "It is useful", "It is popular", or "I like it", only Peregrine Fisher, John Z and DHowell actually referred to sources that they felt established notability. Since these comments were outweighed by those feeling that the article failed our notability policy, I think this has to be a Delete Tim Vickers (talk) 23:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is not notable and is fancruft. There is solely an in universe context and no real world notability can be established. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 18:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Macgyver problem solving in my opinion can stand on its own. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.13.141.100 (talk) 19:17, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This needs to go on deletionpedia for eternal preservation. -72.93.211.14 (talk) 20:41, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Feel that the article is relevant and valuable both in relation to the show MacGyver and in allowing users to gain an insight into what MacGyver is/does. AlbertSimon (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]