The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of punk compilation albums[edit]

List of punk compilation albums (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no clear inclusion criteria. Most of the listed entries are not notable. I see no reason why a genre should get its list of compilation albums when such a list would be vastly indiscriminate. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Qualifies for an article per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Punk rock compilation albums. Furthermore, nearly all of the listed albums have their own standalone articles. The inclusion criteria seems very plain to me, it's a list of punk rock compilation albums, and it is not indiscriminate, in my view. Also, sources are available; I added one to the article to improve it. Lastly, this should be renamed to List of punk rock compilation albums. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Wikipedia routinely classifies music by genre, and the vast majority of its sources also do so. The list contains enough notable albums for a standalone list, most of which can be clearly assigned to the punk genre (or subgenres of punk). --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Clear inclusion criteria, pretty much every entry on the list has an article and per WP:CLN, the list goes hand-in-hand with the category for navigation. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - Laughably incomplete, which is an editing matter. Carrite (talk) 04:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.