The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Nomination provides no deletion rationale. --Doncram (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, and with well-defined inclusion criteria. Requires cleanup and improvement, not deletion. Lowercaserho (talk) 21:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - needing improvement is never a reason to delete. Have put my thoughts re inclusion criteria on the talk page. Mjroots (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.