- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:30, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- List of television stations in Brazil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article should be deleted as it lacks context. It Is a simple listing without context information and contains loosely related items. (See WP:NOTDIR) This article also has no sources because the information in it may be challenged so it fails WP:GNG. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions) 00:31, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:30, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's a perfect ordinary and valid main list per Category:Lists of television channels by country and Category:Brazilian television networks, and WP:CLN. Could be renamed or tweaked, sure. No valid reason to delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The notability issue is a non-starter. This just needs to be cleaned up and reformatted. It wouldn't take much time at all to retool this page into a rather useful list. See Category:Brazilian television networks for more. giso6150 (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Nothing wrong with the article title itself as such as subject (TV stations in the fifth most populous country in the world) would certainly pass WP:LISTN, it is clear the article needs expansion. Ajf773 (talk) 07:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. but could do with tidyng up. Mecha Bieber (talk) 05:50, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Deletion nominator should take note of wp:CLNT which describes how categories, lists, and navigation templates are complementary, and generally supports a decision rule that if there's a category of things, there can be a list of those things. --doncram 17:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.