The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lorraine Cink

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress known only for her YouTube videos; doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG (or WP:GNGACTOR). BLP prod removed by author upon addition of a link to Cink's website. I'd go speedy-A7, but that just seems a bit too brusque... Ignatz mice•talk 14:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:38, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - although she's not notable as an actor, she could become notable in the future. That having been said, being up and coming, or a member of Equity are reasons to delete, not to keep. So: delete subject to later re-creation. Bearian (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.