The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with WP:NPASR. SoWhy 15:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MC Primo[edit]

MC Primo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

His death received very little coverage for a short period of time (WP:NOTTEMP/WP:NOTNEWS), it's only a WP:ROTM crime news. The sources barely say something about his career. As a singer he does not seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO and as a politician he was not even elected as an alderman. Carlinho Teves (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Carlinho Teves (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Carlinho Teves (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Carlinho Teves (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep has coverage in reliable sources such as here Atlantic306 (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: Yes, there are some reliable sources, such as Record (R7) and Globo (G1), but as a popular artist he did not seem to be that popular. And he was a singer of funk carioca, which in Brazil is usually very popular, but among the singers of Funk carioca, he did not have a significant coverage which a really popular artist would. Using a similar example of WP:GHITS: "The search-engine test may, however, be useful as a negative test of popular culture topics which one would expect to see sourced via the Internet. A search on an alleged "Internet meme" that returns only one or two distinct sources is a reasonable indication that the topic is not as notable as has been claimed. As well, numerous hits that refer to X as "Y" can demonstrate that "Y" is a plausible redirect to the article on X; the redirects for discussion process, unlike articles for deletion, will often hinge on matters such as plausibility and numbers of search engine results." Carlinho Teves (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Although the person appears not to be extremely famous the sources provide seem to suffice in providing proof of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sea Cucumber 17 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC) Indeffed as sockpuppet. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:48, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: It was deleted from Wikipedia in Portuguese two days ago. It was an unanimous consensus among Brazilian editors that the article should be deleted. The reasons presented there were the same that were presente here. Carlinho Teves (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment: The user who created the article is blocked for sockpuppetry and cross-wiki abuse (meta:Special:CentralAuth/Dele T). Carlinho Teves (talk) 01:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.