The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Sandstein 18:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MENAFN[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no sourcing. This article has long confused MENAFN and Mena report, and all the sources were about the latter. There does not appear to be notability for MENAFN. Alyo (chat·edits) 17:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Websites, Jordan, and Delaware. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:14, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. This article's history is problematic. From the beginning, the subject was confused with late-blooming competitor Mena Report, and as a result of that was redirected to that entity's parent company. The redirect was subsequently listed for discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 22#MENAFN, at the end of which it was restored to article status based upon it being a separate entity. Although the origin information was finally corrected today, independent coverage of this website does not appear to exist outside of its own postings. Havradim leaf a message 21:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.