The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 06:50, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MTR Light Rail Route 505[edit]

MTR Light Rail Route 505 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Could easily be summarised in one or two paragraphs in Light Rail (Hong Kong) § Stops and routes. Article has been unsourced since its creation; I could not find any reliable sources on either Google or DuckDuckGo except for short news briefs on minor traffic accidents. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 14:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep - An entire rail route. It's impossible for such a project to be completed without a great amount of government environmental, budgetary and planning reports. Far too much topic-specific content along with all the other routes to be summarized in the general MTR routes and stops article. --Oakshade (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Changed to Speedy as I just noticed this was just nominated for AfD by the same nom and closed as "Keep" less than two months ago. The nom needs to move on. --Oakshade (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Oakshade: The construction information is in the Light Rail (Hong Kong) article – this is not an entire rail line, but a light rail service. Only five stops on the network (out of 68) are serviced by only one route. In the last nomination, only one comment (by Useddenim, merge into main article) mentioned the route articles; the rest focused only on the stop articles. Jc86035 (talk | contribs) Use ((re|Jc86035)) to reply to me 07:00, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • That most AfD participants didn't even bother mentioning the route articles just confirms there was no consensus to delete them when proposed for deletion.--Oakshade (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.