The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Magicians_of_Xanth#Dolph. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Magician Dolph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character with no significant coverage Sadads (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Magicians_of_Xanth#Dolph, doesn't need an article of it's own. In fact looking at the Xanth template at the bottom there's quite a lot there for one book series. This level of detail looks more appropriate for the Xanth wiki than here.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per ThePaintedOne. Jclemens (talk) 17:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect for the sake of building a consensus. No significant coverage to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:14, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.