The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 18:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Draft

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Trivial and non-notable. Fails WP:GNG. Also see WP:SPORTCRIT. Full of redlinks and broken templates. Created as part of a large swath of pages by a single user who has since left. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 02:28, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:27, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, at least for now I'm not sure we're looking at the same page. There are very few redlinks. This is in fact a master List of Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Drafts (and I think should be renamed as such) and until such time as the individual drafts years are deleted, we could use a list for navigation purposes. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:29, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course, should all those drafts-by-year get deleted, there'd be no need for a list of them. Then it's a question of whether we need a separate article on the draft as distinct from Major League Lacrosse. Probably not, based on what would be left in the nommed article -- the nominator's right about that. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As Shawn says, this is a legitimate list of mainly bluelinked draft articles. As noted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2001 Major League Lacrosse Collegiate Draft, the MLL drafts are substantially covered in media (see the GNews and HighBeam results in the findsources links above), and I don't see a reason to remove this draft information, which is sourceable and similar to draft articles we have for other sports. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:18, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is a valid list and there aren't many redlinked articles in it. -- Dane ^talk 03:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.