The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --JForget 22:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Malaiyamaan Kaari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Tagged for sourcing for nearly 2 years... per WP:V we need to find reliable sources about this topic to continue including it in Wikipedia, 2 years with no verification this isn't a hoax is long enough. Rividian (talk) 16:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. In brief searches unable to find sources. Article could always come back if sourced, but to allow this unsourced WP:OR article for this long is not the best way to go. Cirt (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Loads of sources at Google Books and Google Scholar. I've put a couple in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Phil -- searching with alternative spellings indicates that this is verifiable. utcursch | talk 14:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sources have been found to verify the artice addressing the concern raised by the nominator. Davewild (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.