The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maligaon[edit]

Maligaon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been nominated due to its noncompliance with WP:GNG and thus has cause for deletion. Wer900 (talk) 04:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:08, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - yes, the place exists, but there has been nothing notable about it that has happened which legitimizes its being given an article on Wikipedia. It exists as a place, and if no more, it belongs on Google Maps, not here. Wer900 (talk) 22:33, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note - The above "!vote" is the nominator. --Oakshade (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I didn't mean to cast a vote. Wer900 talkessay on the definition of consensus 23:01, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.