- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nominator is sock and only other comment is a keep (non-admin closure) Jumpytoo Talk 00:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Mao Zedong Flag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Similar to Red Song Society, the website is largely a product of a very minor media company in China and most of its content is blog-style. Everyone can publish their articles (without royalties) on the website and thus the website is subject to pervasive conspiracy theories and yellow journalism. Most importantly, the article lacks sufficient sources to support its independent notability. NZCAJD2 (talk) 09:55, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are at least three sources sufficient to meet SIGCOV: [1][2][3]. As with Red Song Society, for which identical criticisms were offered, attacks on the article subject are misplaced at an AfD nomination. Oblivy (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.