The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 22:20, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Johnen

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While playing in 3. Liga would make him notable as per WP:NFOOTY, he still has yet to make an official appearance on the pitch. WP:TOOSOON. nearlyevil 665 07:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 07:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 07:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or draftify, fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Geschichte (talk) 19:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG as there is no significant coverage about him. Doesn't matter if he appears in a game tomorrow, he still needs significant coverage. The FAQ from the top of WP:NFOOTBALL makes it crystal clear that all sport figures need to pass WP:GNG regardless of how many professional appearances they have.
Q2: If a sports figure meets the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not have to meet the general notability guideline?
A2: No, the article must still eventually provide sources indicating that the subject meets the general notability guideline. Although the criteria for a given sport should be chosen to be a very reliable predictor of the availability of appropriate secondary coverage from reliable sources, there can be exceptions. For contemporary persons, given a reasonable amount of time to locate appropriate sources, the general notability guideline should be met in order for an article to meet Wikipedia's standards for inclusion. (For subjects in the past where it is more difficult to locate sources, it may be necessary to evaluate the subject's likely notability based on other persons of the same time period with similar characteristics.)
Alvaldi (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no significant coverage found, does not meet WP:GNG. Alvaldi hit the nail on the head. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 21:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - still young so has potential to make debut in not-too-distant future. Microwave Anarchist (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not follows the norms, no reliable sources found.Aloolkaparatha (talk) 03:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify, likely to pass notability criteria within the next six months. —Kusma (talk) 10:36, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.