- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:39, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mari Rodriguez Ichaso
[edit]
- Mari Rodriguez Ichaso (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Some trivial coverage from CNN but notability is not inherited. It's been tagged for approximately a decade. Coverage of Ichaso is patchy at best. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:50, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I added some recent articles that I think get her over the hurdle. The article definitely needs a rewrite. Patapsco913 (talk) 10:23, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm probably looking at the sources enhanced post-AFD but I see two sources there with medium length coverage. North8000 (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Switched mine due to more detailed analysis of sources by Ravenswing and others below. North8000 (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: For my part, I actually read the new sources proffered. One is an interview of the subject, which cannot bolster the notability of the subject. The second is an extensive piece by CNN, which would certainly count as a reliable source ... if it wasn't about her being hired by CNN, and thus blatantly primary. Of the two sources already in the article, they both are the exact same thing: a three-sentence long profile by an organization of which she is a member. 0+0+0+0=0. Ravenswing 06:27, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 03:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.