The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 02:27, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mariko Morikawa[edit]

Mariko Morikawa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards or nominations. No nontrivial pertinent GNews or GBooks hits. Negligible independent reliable sourcing -- aside from a single review which apparently comments mostly on whether the actress should be described as "pudgy", the sources which actually mention the article subject are databases and vendor sites. Survived 2007 AFD based on long-deprecated version of PORNBIO, under criteria that today don't establish notability The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That appears to be a book on the history of Japanese pink cinema (softcore pornography). Morikawa was a hardcore actress who only appeared in a single pink film, so it's not surprising she wouldn't be mentioned. --Cckerberos (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.