The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Abdollahian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an imp[roved version of an earlier deleted article. (now at User:Reneemoon/Mark Abdollahian). I remain uncertain of notability. He is one of the eight editors of an important book, but the other academic work is minor. DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt. WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Hello Xxanthippe, can you explain little bit more on why the article you think is "too soon"? the 1st version hadn't been updated on big modification for a quite long time (such as publish not on date, ref not clear, words should be reworded, so the 2nd version improved all those from that quite long time ago (I don't know where to look the date of big modification for a article, but I guess should be more than a year or so). But please feel free to leave any comments or improvement that could make this article better. Thank you. Reneemoon (talk) 06:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - while the citation count for Power Transitions is a nice 459, that's about it. With only that, doesn't pass WP:ACADEMIC, and there's definitely not enough coverage to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:04, 2 January 2017 (UTC)d[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.