- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Mark Hallman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recording engineer, producer, and session musician whose sole claim to notability appears to be a single article in Rolling Stone in 1977 that describes his (non-notable) band's association with Carole King. Even that link appears on a third-party website, not RS's, although the article may be genuine. The other sources are not considered reliable (AllMusic, etc.) The discography, while massive, consists almost entirely of work as a recording engineer and session musician, with some credits as producer, but again, is completely unsourced. The entire page appears to have been designed carefully in a short period of time to overwhelm the reader with information, as if the size of it will confer notability. It does not, in my opinion. Rockypedia (talk) 15:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 15:55, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I respectfully disagree. I have just begun this page and will be adding more content to it in the next few weeks. There is a film coming out this spring about this very humble artist. The third party site is Cameron Crowe's personal site - the author of the Rolling Stone article who (look him up) is extremely notable. Mark has been name checked on TWENTY SEVEN other Wikipedia pages. SnowyOwl512 (talk) 05:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NOTINHERITED Rockypedia (talk) 04:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- comment I am not sure if I have a voice in this discussion as I am the creator of this page but strongly request a KEEP. I have added a few more links and updated content including his winning two years in a row Producer of the Year at the Austin Music Awards held at the SXSW Music Conference. Most of Mark Hallman's interviews are pre-internet. I replaced the original Rolling Stone link I had to another link - it was syndicated in the New York Times and other publications as well and written by Cameron Crowe. The Austin Chronicle interview - http://www.austinchronicle.com/music/1996-11-08/525544/ is lengthy. He personally produced three albums for Carole King, performed in her band alone and as a part of Navarro, which served as her backing band. Navarro themselves are notable, releasing two albums on Capitol Records in the '70s, although they do not yet have a page. There is more information I am in the process of researching about Mark Hallman's association with Dan Fogelberg as well. I reduced the discography to the bare bones and will find further articles if necessary. SnowyOwl512 (talk) 00:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I moved some references around and did a copy edit -- I agree that the article initially overstated his significance. But notability has been established; the Austin Chronicleis a reliable source, and Hallman is featured prominently in the Rolling Stone article. PBS and Billboard confirm that he did in fact produce Carole King, not just work with her as a musician or engineer. Also - just as an aside - Navarro passes WP:NMUSIC if only because they released two albums on Capital. I suspect they would also pass WP:GNG but it would require digging since they broke up in 70s. JSFarman (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.