The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ...and then selectively restore original redirect. j⚛e decker^talk 17:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark St. James (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This blogger doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG with only passing mentions in reliable sources (refs 3-6) or primary sources (1-2). SmartSE (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:07, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note that prior to this article being created, the title existed as a redirect to Marc St. James, a notable television character whose first name runs a high risk of being misspelled by users since "Mark" is more common a spelling than "Marc" in many English-speaking countries. I agree that the blogger does not have sufficient coverage in reliable sources to qualify for an article, but the title should be reverted back to a redirect rather than simply becoming a redlink. Revision delete the edits that have taken place since July 18, but keep the original redirect. Bearcat (talk) 18:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes I should have said that. Please leave the redirect to Marc St. James. SmartSE (talk) 21:40, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete (keeping the old redirect). Subject is a fashion blogger with a real following (13,000 on twitter) but no evidence I can find of significant coverage in reliable sources. Sources on page are article he wrote and a couple of shout-outs to his blog.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the edits of the current article, and restore the previous redirect. It's pure self-promo of a person with no claim to notability. Kraxler (talk) 16:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.