The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I am put in this position due to all three keep !votes either being misaligned with policy (#1) or appropriately refuted (#2 and #3). Happy to draftify upon request if desired by any editor. Daniel (talk) 04:24, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marko Levishyn

[edit]
Marko Levishyn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only primary sources provided. LibStar (talk) 02:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Like the majority of articles, sources determine notability, an analysis would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This added source is just a 1 sentence mention of Levishyn and not SIGCOV. LibStar (talk) 10:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aydoh8[contribs] 06:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.