The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 15:19, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Charles Katz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reliable sources independent of the subject to establish the notability of this subject. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. J04n(talk page) 19:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The article has been deleted at least once before (maybe twice), and I proposed it for deletion last year. Yet there are still no sources, and not much of a claims of notability.   Will Beback  talk  20:43, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Lacks WP:RS to support WP:GNG, let alone WP:BLP or WP:PROF … how has this survived for four years? Happy Editing! — 70.21.16.94 (talk · contribs) _{17:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)}[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.