The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 01:01, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Susan Vaughn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Autobiography. Is she notable? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not notable based on the material presented. No paintings in major museums. No major awards. If there's more material, let's see it. DGG (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The awards listed seem minor at best and unless there's recognition for her work that's not mentioned in the article, the subject seems to be a non-notable artist. Rnb (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a side note, it appears as if the article is quickly becoming a non-npov advertisement for her, her work, her website(s) and anything else related to her. Rnb (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Appears to fail WP:CREATIVE, the notability criteria for artists. -Verdatum (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 01:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per DGG et al. Johnbod (talk) 03:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Was already speedily deleted three days ago, but this has been ignored by the creator. LuciferMorgan (talk) 21:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.