The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g11, disguised website ad. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:14, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Master of Badness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

WP:OR, WP:DICT.. anything else? -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 15:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete This nonsense should have been marked as such (((db-nonsense))) and never gotten to the AfD process in the first place. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:39, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nom. I nominated this for speedy, viewing this as original research, unsourced, and yielding no Google hits, a test page at best. I would have marked it as nonsense, but I know that some would make the literal interpretation that the article is coherent, and thus... JNW (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to drop a speedy too, just couldn't think of a criteria. That article doesn't appear to be a test page (original research, unsourced doesn't fit g2), I don't believe its gibberish either. -Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 16:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I can't find a good Speedy Criteria for this one, but it's clear that the subject is non-existant at worst, and non-notable at best. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 16:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Rationale for not applying speedy understood and appreciated. It just looked like a freshman level test balloon, a first-time contribution, so one had hoped that a speedy death would be most merciful. JNW (talk) 16:36, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Made up in one day, or more like one hour. Someone snowball this, please! Unusual? Quite ^TalkQu 00:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - WP is not Urban Dictionary and WP:OR The muffin is not subtle (talk) 02:00, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per just about every policy. Themfromspace (talk) 03:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails the Everything test. JuJube (talk) 11:26, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.