The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G11. 10:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Masterpiece Living (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Strike the stuff about the MacArthur Foundation Study on Aging and its report, "Successful Aging". They may well be notable enough for their own article but not here. What are we left with? A load of vague peacock terms but very little sound information as to what Masterpiece Living actually is. Their website (which is probably written by the author of this article) is equally vague. In short: spam for a non-notable organisation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete per G7 - obvious advertising that is wholly unencyclopaedic. Failing that, regular-style delete due to the article failing to establish the notability of its subject matter. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • You mean G11. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete G11. So tagged. (Spam.) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.